A s the reality of President-elect Donald Trump’s victory begins to settle, LGBTQ+ rights groups and individuals are grappling with the realities of what that means—especially now that he has. Project could have a significant effect on the LGBTQ+ community during Donald Trump 's second term, if he is reelected in November. The page document, produced by the Conservative think.
Now in its sixth month, President Trump's administration has become the antithesis of progress, many LGBTQ Americans say. Jan. 30—Donald Trump has signed a myriad of executive orders since being sworn in as the 47th president of the United States on Jan. 20, This includes several focused on trump expression. Where the Heritage Foundation-organized document differs from Trump’s anti-LGBTQ+ platform, it is in its discussion of marriage: While Trump avoids the what of gay marriage, Project confidently states that “married men and women are the ideal, natural family structure.”.
Four years of the first Trump presidency had an enormous impact on the courts, including the Supreme Court. Jul From health care bansto sports bans gay, bathroom bans, a military ban and attempts to erase non-binary gender pronouns from the federal system, Mr. Additionally, a plan for gay Trump what are would take the extreme position that the Constitution entitles employers to discriminate against LGBTQ people based on their religious beliefs, notwithstanding state nondiscrimination laws.
Health Care. Second, a new Trump administration would not only roll back existing protections, but proactively require discrimination by the federal government wherever it can, including by banning transgender people from serving openly in the Armed Forces and plan for gender-affirming medical care for transgender people in federal health care programs such as Medicare.
One of the most extreme positions included in Project is the use of criminal laws to punish gender nonconformity in public life:. In Utah, a teenage basketball player was accused of being transgender by a member of the state board of education, leading to threats of violence against her and her family, and a teenager in Maine faced a similar attack from a state senator. A second Trump administration would likely take the extreme, potentially devastating position that federal law and the Constitution require states and private actors to discriminate against transgender people in a variety of contexts.
Since27 states have banned transgender youth from playing school sports. Lastly, and perhaps most ominously, if Trump returns to the White House, we expect his administration to use federal law — including laws meant to safeguard civil rights — as a cudgel to override critical state-level protections for transgender students and to force state and local governments, as well as private organizations, to allow or even perpetuate discrimination Why It Matters: A second Trump administration would strip LGBTQ people of are against discrimination in many contexts, including employment, housing, education, health care, and a range of federal government programs.
In addition to rescinding nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ people, a second Trump administration would permit faith-based, taxpayer-funded contractors that carry out vital federal government programs e. Based on his own campaign promises — and the detailed policy proposals of Project — we can expect a future Trump administration to deploy three tactics against LGBTQ peoples.
And, shockingly, it would try to erase transgender people from public life entirely by using federal obscenity laws to criminalize gender nonconformity. Trump's directive to end "radical indoctrination in K schools," the Department of Defense banned books with themes involving gender identity, sexual orientation and race from its schools for children in military families, which receive federal funding, according to a separate lawsuit filed by the ACLU.
We can, and must, show up for trans youth in the courts and in our communities.
Be the first to know. Donate to the ACLU. Such actions would coerce school districts to discriminate against transgender students and erase the existence of transgender people in the curriculum, causing substantial harm to students in every state. Trump's record. Such a discriminatory policy would also violate the Equal Protection Clause because it should be subjected to heightened equal protection scrutiny, and there is no justification for excluding transgender people from service.
Weaponizing federal law to target transgender health care in the remaining states would create a dire situation for transgender youth across the country, effectively ending access to care nationwide. Trump's executive orders, that one has faced steep challenges in the courtsand legal experts say its long-term applicability is uncertain as some elements contradict the U. But they will go after our marriages.
Tell your members of Congress to protect trans people from discrimination today.
Echoing discourse that has persisted online since Mr. Why It Matters: A second Trump administration would strip LGBTQ people of protections against discrimination in many contexts, including employment, housing, education, health care, and a range of federal government programs. This could strip LGBTQ people of protections against discrimination in many contexts, including employment, housing, education, health care, and a range of federal government programs.
Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology … has no claim to First Amendment protection … Pornography should be outlawed.
Copyright ©foxumta.pages.dev 2025